You see it above: the dreaded question mark which leaves no question 
      that something is amiss.
      A lot in this case. 
      Killshot is a routine gangster flick about a divorcing couple who 
      witness an attempted murder, and thus become targets for the killers. The 
      FBI sends them into witness protection, but the killers are quite a bit 
      smarter than the FBI and figure out a way to fake their own deaths, thus 
      flushing the witnesses out of hiding and back to their home.
      The film is not without positives, the strongest of which is the 
      powerful, dominating presence of Mickey Rourke as a cool and composed 
      native American (?!) who works as a professional killer. The story comes 
      from an Elmore Leonard book, and Mr. Leonard's work has inspired several 
      memorable films, including Jackie Brown, Get Shorty, Out of Sight, two 
      versions of The Big Bounce, and two versions of 3:10 to Yuma. The 
      cinematographer is Caleb Deschanel, arguably the best in the business (5 
      Oscar nominations). The director is John Madden, who was nominated for an 
      Oscar for Shakespeare in Love. The supporting cast is solid as well: Diane 
      Lane and Tom Jane play the endangered couple.
      And she looks so young.
      Because she was!
      And that brings us back to the matter of the question mark. You're 
      probably wondering why a film with all that A-list and B-list firepower is 
      going straight to the bargain bin at Wal-Mart. Long story.
      Killshot had a troubled development process. Filming was completed in 
      2005, but that footage proved incapable of being edited into an acceptable 
      film, so the principals were called back for more shooting in January of 
      2007. In the re-writing process, one main character was eliminated 
      altogether, so Johnny Knoxville, who was featured prominently in the 
      original theatrical trailer back in 2006, ended up being cut from the film 
      completely. At various times, script revisions were done by Sydney Pollack 
      and Anthony Minghella, both of whom were inconsiderate enough to die 
      before the film could be completed. At one time Quentin Tarantino was 
      attached to the film in some type of producer status, but he didn't end up 
      signing the scorecard. Over the years, the film had been tentatively 
      scheduled for a release in five or six different periods, all of which got 
      postponed as the key distribution deadlines approached. At least some of 
      that had to do with internal problems at the Weinstein studio. In the 
      process of reorganizing their operation in the past year or so, the 
      Weinsteins tried (and failed) to sell their rights to this film, but no 
      other studios took the bait. After all the starts and stops, the film's 
      final theatrical presence in North America was limited to a trial run in 
      five theaters in Phoenix, after which the suits decided to release it to 
      DVD with no theatrical rollout. It might have found its way into a few 
      more theaters on the coattails of a Mickey Rourke Oscar, but the Mickster 
      lost out to Sean Penn, and that shut off the last hope for a Killshot run 
      in the cineplexes.
      To be honest, this film is better than many theatrical releases, but 
      everyone could see that it was not headed for blockbuster status, and 
      nobody was much motivated to push it. Fixed expenses had already been 
      covered, of course, but nobody was confident that the film would cover the 
      variable expenses involved in a theatrical run. It might have grossed $20 
      million or so with a little luck, but a big chunk of that would have been 
      eaten up by the usual costs of making prints and buying ads. Given that 
      the studios pick up all of the variable expenses but get only about half 
      of the gross, and given that the cash outlays occur before the grosses 
      accrue, the Weinsteins didn't like their odds, so the DVD path seemed to 
      be less risky, especially since the studio seems to be watching the 
      pennies in the midst of rumored cash flow problems
      So it goes.
      As for the film itself, it lacks anything to make it memorable, but 
      it's not such a bad watch if you ignore some of the implausible elements 
      of the script and just focus on the positives I listed above. It would 
      have been a mediocre theatrical product, but as a straight-to-DVD product, 
      it is primo rental material for fans of the genre! The Mickster alone, 
      fascinating as always,  makes it a worthwhile time-killer for those who 
      like the Elmore Leonard oeuvre.