| 
            Philip Marlowe has traditionally been played by 
            such macho icons as Bob Mitchum and Humphrey Bogart, who limned a 
            portrait of a laconic, wisecrackin', tough guy. Eliot Gould kept the 
            wisecracks, but played the private dick as an eternally chattering 
            pussy.  He did more mumbling in this movie than Milton the 
            Stapler Guy did in Office Space. Those previous Marlowes were 
            lady-killers. Gould plays Marlowe as a slob and a chain-smoking douchebag who couldn't get 
            laid in Vegas with a fistful of hundreds.The story takes place in the 1970's instead of 
            the 1940's, although Marlowe drives a 1940's car. The intention of 
            the car, of course, is to symbolize Marlowe's anachronistic values 
            in a world of amorphous morality.Director Robert Altman played this about halfway 
            between a 1940's movie and a parody of 1940's movies. One example: 
            do you recall how old movies use a single musical theme for a 
            character, which is played again and again at different tempos or in 
            different keys depending on the mood of that character? Altman 
            features a whisky-voiced jazz-blues version of "The Long Goodbye" in 
            the opening credits to familiarize us with the tune, then uses this 
            melody as virtually the entire musical score. If Marlowe is in 
            Mexico, he hears a mariachi version. High school football game? A 
            marching band version. Funeral? A dirge version in a minor key. And 
            so forth.Eliot Gould and Sterling Hayden are about the 
            only professional actors in the cast. The supporting cast features 
            people like Danish model/socialite Nina van Pallandt, who had never 
            before appeared in an English-language movie, baseball pitcher Jim 
            Bouton, concept comic Henry Gibson, and bodybuilder Arnold Strong 
            (whom we later came to know and love as Schwarzenegger). | 
    
        | 
          
            
                | 
                DVD info from Amazon.
                 
                  
                  widescreen anamorphic, 2.35:1
                  featurette with Gould and Altman
                  featurette with the cinematographer |  |  
          Although he updated the story and the character to the 
          70's, Altman did retain certain key elements of the storyline 
          and Philip Marlowe's personality. The film ends when Marlowe commits 
          an act which most of us would consider to be a form of immoral 
          vigilante justice. Yet it is consistent with his belief system and his 
          own sense of integrity, and that action allows the film to pull back 
          from campy fun and re-establish the proper noir tone. Marlowe is 
          supposed to be a guy whose values and standards are higher than those 
          of the people around him, and Altman manages to convey that. The 
          original Marlowe didn't belong in seedy, corrupt L.A.. The new 
          Marlowe, with his cheap J.C. Penney suits, and his inflexible sense of 
          right and wrong, doesn't belong in the Age of Aquarius.  
          I think if you just forget that the character is 
          supposed to be "Philip Marlowe" and allow yourself to view it afresh, 
          you'll find it an interesting film.  | 
    
        | 
            
                | The
                Critics Vote | The People
                Vote ...    |  
                | IMDb
                guideline: 7.5 usually indicates a level of
                excellence, about like three and a half stars
                from the critics. 6.0 usually indicates lukewarm
                watchability, about like two and a half stars
                from the critics. The fives are generally not
                worthwhile unless they are really your kind of
                material, about like two stars from the critics.
                Films under five are generally awful even if you
                like that kind of film, equivalent to about one
                and a half stars from the critics or less,
                depending on just how far below five the rating
                is. My own
                guideline: A means the movie is so good it
                will appeal to you even if you hate the genre. B means the movie is not
                good enough to win you over if you hate the
                genre, but is good enough to do so if you have an
                open mind about this type of film. C means it will only
                appeal to genre addicts, and has no crossover
                appeal. D means you'll hate it even if you
                like the genre. E means that you'll hate it even if
                you love the genre. F means that the film is not only
                unappealing across-the-board, but technically
                inept as well. Based on this description, this 
                film is a C+. Interesting film. A very different approach to the 
                private eye genre, part serious noir, part high camp, yet 
                strangely faithful to Marlowe's "outsider" spirit. |  |